Now, finally, let's look at the third and most
challenging scripture:
And
there came to Him Pharisees, putting Him to the test and saying,
Is it lawful for one to dismiss his wife for every cause? And answering,
he said, Have you not read, The Creator from the beginning,
a male
and a female He made them, and said, On this account a man shall
forsake his father and his mother and shall be joined to his
wife,
and they shall be, the two, one flesh, insomuch that no longer
are they two, but one flesh? Therefore, that which God once
and for
all yoked together, let man not be separating. They say to Him,
Why then did Moses command [Ancient
Greek: entellomai: command, enjoin] to
give her a bill of divorce and dismiss her? He says to them,
Moses, on account of the
hardness of your
heart permitted [Greek: epitrepo:
allow, enable, let, permit] you to dismiss your wives.
But from the beginning
it (namely the right of divorce) has not been thus, right down
to the present moment, and as a result it continues to be
at variance
with the original enactment. Moreover, I am saying to you, Whoever
dismisses his wife [Greek:
"gune": a woman, a wife] FOR
ANY OTHER CAUSE THAN FORNICATION [Ancient
Greek: porneia: prostitution idolatry], and marries another,
is committing adultery [Greek:
moichao: to commit adultery]. His disciples say to Him,
Since the matter is thus with reference to the man's aforementioned
reason
in the case of his wife, it is not expedient to marry. And He said
to them, Not all receive with the understanding this word,
but those
to whom it has been given to receive it ... (Matthew 19:3-11
ETGNT).
"Moreover,
it was said, Whoever dismisses his wife [Greek: "gune":
a woman, a wife],
let him give her a bill of divorce. But, as for myself, I am
saying to you,
Everyone who dismisses his wife except in a case of unchastity [Ancient
Greek: porneia: prostitution idolatry],
causes her to committ adultery, and whoever marries her who
has been dismissed, commits adultery [Greek:
moichao: to commit adultery]." (Matthew 5:31-32).
"Moreover,
I am saying to you, Whoever dismisses his wife
[Greek: "gune": a woman,
a wife] for any other cause than FORNICATION [Ancient
Greek: "porneia":
prostitution idolatry]
and marries another, is committing adultery [Greek:
moichao: to commit adultery].
(Matthew 19:9 ETGNT).
One
reason this passage presents the greatest challenge
is the wide variety of English translations for the Greek word "porneia".
In
Ancient Koine Greek, "porneia"
meant
"prostitution idolatry",
referring to a widespread practice
in Gentile pagan temples where both male and female priests were worshipped
as gods and sexual intercourse was part of the "religious"
experience.
Checking
fifteen English translations of the Bible, "porneia"
has been translated adultery
(2), fornication (4),
immorality (1), marital
unfaithfulness (2), sexual
immorality (2), terrible
sexual sin (1), unchastity
(1), unfaithful (1), and
whoredom (1).
Another
reason this passage presents the greatest
challenge is our inclination to think about the "exception
clause" out of context.
Read and understand these four important confirmations
and teachings of Jesus and one important clarification
by the Apostle Paul, then read the "exception clause":
1-
In the "exception clause passage", Jesus confirmed
the permanent, once and for all "one-flesh union".
The
Pharisee's asked Jesus, "Is it lawful
for one to dismiss his wife for every cause?"
Jesus
answered: "Have you not read ... a man shall forsake
his father and his mother and shall be joined to his wife, and they
shall be, the two, one flesh, insomuch that no longer are they two,
but one flesh? Therefore, that which God once and for all yoked
together, let man not be separating" (Matt. 19:5-6
ETGNT).
""Have
you not read" undoubtedly refers to this Old Scripture passage:
"The Man said, 'This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called woman for she was taken
out of man". For this reason a man will leave his father and
mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh."
(Gen. 2:23-24 NIV)
It was
common practice in those days for husbands to divorce their wives
"for every cause" (i.e. if she no longer pleased him for
any reason whatsoever). The
answer Jesus gave simply focused on the "one-flesh
union".
Take
a close look at the “one-flesh
union” that the LORD God creates and you find
that man has no power to separate what
God has joined or, as the Greek puts it, glued
or adhered together. An advocate of remarriage after
divorce or marriage to a divorced person can
only add or condone counterfeit unions to the one genuine union God
created, thus creating a condition called “adultery”.
Even a divorce decree issued by a court of law cannot break the one-flesh
union although it can legally and physically separate the couple and
provide support for the spouse and children. The "one-flesh union"
that God creates remains intact until
the death of one of the partners:
"A
woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband
dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes, but he must belong
to the Lord." 1 Corinthians 7:39 NIV).
2-
In the "exception clause passage", Jesus confirmed
the dissolubility of marriage.
Then
they asked him,
"Why
then did Moses command to give her a bill of divorce and dismiss her?"
JESUS
ANSWERED: Moses, on account of the hardness of your heart
[Greek:
sklerokardia - destitution of perception]
permitted you to dismiss your wives. But from the beginning
it (namely the right of divorce) has never been thus, right down
to the present moment, and as a result it continues to be at variance
with the original enactment (Matt. 19:8 ETGNT).
Notice
how Jesus corrects the Pharisee's use of the word COMMAND
and changes it to PERMIT, reminding
them it was because of the HARDNESS OF THEIR HEART that Moses did
that.
Faced with their stubborn, stiff necked rebellion, what else was
Moses to do? But now, Jesus is faced with the Pharisee's hardness
of heart
but he just tells it like it is and holds the standard high. It's
no wonder the religious people of his day wanted to silence him!
3-
In the "exception clause passage", Jesus taught
that Divorce + Marriage or Remarriage = Adultery.
JESUS
CONTINUED: Moreover, I am saying to you, Whoever dismisses
his wife
[Greek: "gune": a woman,
a wife] for any other cause than fornication [Ancient
Greek: "porneia":
prostitution idolatry]
and marries another, is committing adultery [Greek:
moichao: to commit adultery].
(Matthew 19:9 ETGNT. See also Matthew 5:31-32).
Another
reason this passage presents the greatest
challenge is the translation of the word "gune"
as wife, thus
making it appear at variance with what Jesus had just confirmed about
the "one-flesh union"
and the dissolubility
of marriage ... but
only if you assume he's talking about MARRIED
PEOPLE.
Let's
take a look at the Jewish betrothal customs. They were far different
from today's engagement customs. In the Jewish culture, the
mutual promise to marry (betrothal) was as binding as marriage.
Moreover, the ONLY REASON
a man could break his promise to marry was if he found his fiance
HAD BEEN UNFAITHFUL
to him (i.e. by committing "prostitution
idolatry" or "fornication") during
the separation time when he was away preparing a home for her.
"Now
the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary
was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found
with child of the Holy Ghost. Then Joseph her husband, being
a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example,
was minded to put her away privily ... Then Joseph being raised
from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took
unto him his wife: and knew her not till she had
brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name
JESUS." (Matthew 1:18-24
KJV).
"This
is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about: His mother Mary was
pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together,
she was found to be with child through the Holy Spirit. Because
Joseph was a righteous man and did not want to expose her to public
disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly ... When Joseph
woke up he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and
took Mary home as his wife. But he had no union with her until she
gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus." (Matthew
1:18-24 NLT).
Now
read the exception clause again!
"Moreover,
I am saying to you, Whoever dismisses his wife [Greek:
"gune": a woman, a wife] for
any other cause than fornication
[Ancient Greek: "porneia":
prostitution idolatry] and marries
another, is committing adultery."
| Who
does the "exception clause" refer to?
If
Jesus was talking about betrothed
or engaged people, then the "exception
clause" is consistent with the Jewish betrothal
and wedding customs and is not in conflict with
his stand on the "one-flesh union" and the "dissolubility
of marriage".
If
Jesus was talking about married
people, then the"exception clause"
presents a challenge because it conflicts with his clear
stand on the "one-flesh union" and the "dissolubility
of marriage".
Conclusion:
we must keep the "exception clause" in context
and consistent with the confirmation of Jesus on the "one-flesh
union" and the "dissolubility of marriage".
Therefore, the "exception clause" must refer
to betrothed or engaged persons who are still unmarried.
The question is one of faithfulness during the separation
period.
|
4-
In the "exception clause passage", Jesus
confirmed not
all can accept these teachings without God's grace.
JESUS
CONTINUED: Not all receive with
the understanding this word, but to those to whom it has been given
to receive it (Matt 19:11 ETGNT).
Now
consider the disciples reaction!
Then
it's better not to marry! (Matt 19.10 NLT) or
Since the matter is thus with reference to the man's aforementioned
reason in the case of his wife, it is not expedient to marry
(Matt 19.10 ETGNT).
The
disciples clearly understood!
If
there's no way you can break the "one-flesh union"
or dissolve marriage by "divorce", then it's
better not to marry in the first place!
Jesus
didn't correct them but only stated:
"Not
all receive with the understanding this word,
but to
those to whom it has been given to receive it, for
there are those of such a nature as to be eunuchs
who were born thus from the mother's womb. And
there are those of such a nature as to have been
made eunuchs by men. And there are those of such
a nature as to have constituted themselves eunuchs
for the sake of the kingdom. He who is able to
receive with understanding, let him be receiving
it."
(See Luke 18:28-30 ETGNT:
Then Peter said, Look, As for us, having abandoned
all our own private possessions,
we became your followers, traveling the same
road with you that you are taking. And He said
to them, Assuredly, I am saying to you, There
is no one who has abandoned house or wife or
brethern or parents or children for the sake
of the kingdom of God, who will not receive much
more at this time, and, in the age to come life
eternal. )
|
5-
The Apostle Paul, under inspiration of God's Holy Spirit, wrote that
if separated or divorced, you have only TWO OPTIONS: remain single or
reconcile.
Now,
for those who are married I have a direct command from the Lord.
A wife must not leave her husband. But if she does leave him, let
her remain single or else go back to him. And the husband must not
leave his wife. Paul apparently didn't think it necessary
to repeat himself but if he had, he undoubtedly would have written,
But if he does leave her, let him remain single or else go back to
her. (1 Corinthians 7:10-11 NLT)
Regretfully,
many believers today (both saints and preachers alike) are just like
the self-righteous Pharisees ... despite the Bible's clear teaching
on the "one-flesh union",
the dissolubility of marriage
and the need to remain single or else
reconcile if separated or divorced, they still divorce
and remarry, not willing to receive and accept the Truth. Some have
even suggested that Jesus permitted
divorce and remarriage for the "innocent party"
while the "guilty party" was
sentenced to remaining single else committing adultery if they remarried.
First, this interpretation conflicts with the "one-flesh union"
and "dissolubility of marriage" that Jesus so plainly
confirmed and his disciples understood and accepted.
Second,
it assumes the existence of an "innocent party". I have
yet to meet an "innocent party"! After all, "It takes
two to tango ... and two to tangle".
Next:
Ch. 7: What About the Mosiac Law?
Next:
Ch. 8: Steps to Reconciliation
Key to translations
used in this article: NLT New Living Translation; KJV King
James Version; NIV New International Version; NAS New American
Standard; ETGNT Wuest's Expanded Translation Greek New Testament
|